Comments on: Benazir Bhutto: Not quite the angel http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172 Cutting straight to the point Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:56:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Tatterdemalian http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30378 Tatterdemalian Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:40:33 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30378 Sorry to keep this thread going, but it's interesting to note all the headlines claiming Pakistani police prevented an autopsy on Bhutto, with a tiny parenthetical note later in the article that they did so on the demands of Bhutto's husband and family. It's the Iranian cultural revolution again. The Bhuttos are complicit in the coverup, hoping to use it against Musharraf. Once again, the Shah will be dragged down by the libertarians and human rights groups, while Ayatollah bin Laden sweeps into victory and promptly eliminates both. Only this time, a nuclear arsenal will fall right into his hands. Sorry to keep this thread going, but it’s interesting to note all the headlines claiming Pakistani police prevented an autopsy on Bhutto, with a tiny parenthetical note later in the article that they did so on the demands of Bhutto’s husband and family.

It’s the Iranian cultural revolution again. The Bhuttos are complicit in the coverup, hoping to use it against Musharraf. Once again, the Shah will be dragged down by the libertarians and human rights groups, while Ayatollah bin Laden sweeps into victory and promptly eliminates both.

Only this time, a nuclear arsenal will fall right into his hands.

]]> By: Jeffrey Nihart http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30354 Jeffrey Nihart Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:17:00 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30354 The Lying Arse Times is no friend of Israel. Why progressives, so hate Hebrews, is a story worthy of an entire web page. Something to ponder. Why would the LA Times, be so afraid of a women, standing up to, the women beating, 7th century troglodytes, that infest the Middle East? jn The Lying Arse Times is no friend of Israel.
Why progressives, so hate Hebrews, is a story worthy of an entire web page.

Something to ponder.
Why would the LA Times, be so afraid of a women, standing up to, the women beating, 7th century troglodytes, that infest the Middle East?

jn

]]> By: MP http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30315 MP Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:57:19 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30315 No one earth is quite an angel. If we're talking corrupt politicians, that is much easier to deal with than Islamic extremists like Al Qaeda and those that likely killed her. No one earth is quite an angel. If we’re talking corrupt politicians, that is much easier to deal with than Islamic extremists like Al Qaeda and those that likely killed her.

]]> By: Tatterdemalian http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30311 Tatterdemalian Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:13:14 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30311 Still not quite the same... Bhutto at least kept the money to herself, instead of funnelling it into increasingly dehumanizing ways to commit acts of terror against Hindus, leading up to a declaration of war against India. At least, as far as we know. I still can't see this assassination being good for anyone but Al Qaeda. If Bhutto had died of AIDS like Arafat, her fans would at least make themselves laughing stocks with their outraged insistence that secret Hindu poisons were to blame. Instead, the UN is seriously entertaining all the dark conspiracies they weave about Musharraf's and Sharif's involvement, and the Pakistani media is happily doing their best to convince everyone that elections are pointless and everyone should boycott them, except of course those who see it as their Islamic duty to put the most extreme believers into power. Still not quite the same… Bhutto at least kept the money to herself, instead of funnelling it into increasingly dehumanizing ways to commit acts of terror against Hindus, leading up to a declaration of war against India. At least, as far as we know.

I still can’t see this assassination being good for anyone but Al Qaeda. If Bhutto had died of AIDS like Arafat, her fans would at least make themselves laughing stocks with their outraged insistence that secret Hindu poisons were to blame. Instead, the UN is seriously entertaining all the dark conspiracies they weave about Musharraf’s and Sharif’s involvement, and the Pakistani media is happily doing their best to convince everyone that elections are pointless and everyone should boycott them, except of course those who see it as their Islamic duty to put the most extreme believers into power.

]]> By: Long_Rifle http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30310 Long_Rifle Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:26:49 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30310 They won't launch one. They claim the bombs are separate from the launchers. The Islamic clerics that take over Pakistan eventually will just claim one of the bunkers was pilfered, and a few bombs are missing. They will be trucked into India, and Israel. And set off. They will give JUST enough warning to stop any counter attacks, and give the terrorists plenty of time to get the bombs in place before the warning. They'll get the best of both worlds. They can USE their nukes, and since they claimed they were stolen, the UN will stop any retaliation. Though I doubt India will care about the UN. They won’t launch one.

They claim the bombs are separate from the launchers.

The Islamic clerics that take over Pakistan eventually will just claim one of the bunkers was pilfered, and a few bombs are missing. They will be trucked into India, and Israel. And set off.

They will give JUST enough warning to stop any counter attacks, and give the terrorists plenty of time to get the bombs in place before the warning.

They’ll get the best of both worlds. They can USE their nukes, and since they claimed they were stolen, the UN will stop any retaliation.

Though I doubt India will care about the UN.

]]> By: SC&A http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30307 SC&A Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:21:15 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30307 Thank you for the link. As I just noted in a cent post, Benazir Bhutto was Pakistan's Arafat. no more and no less. She may have dined with presidents and prime ministers, but in the end, she stole billions from her nation and paid for and supported terror when it served her needs. Knowing how to use a knife and fork could not change who she was. Thank you for the link.

As I just noted in a cent post, Benazir Bhutto was Pakistan’s Arafat. no more and no less.

She may have dined with presidents and prime ministers, but in the end, she stole billions from her nation and paid for and supported terror when it served her needs.

Knowing how to use a knife and fork could not change who she was.

]]> By: Meryl Yourish http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30306 Meryl Yourish Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:33:17 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30306 I don't think Pakistan can be saved, frankly. Its history is one of Islamic fanaticism. It was created because the Muslims of the Indo-Pakistan region couldn't get along with the Hindus that lived there. They still don't. The big question is, when they launch the Islamic bomb, who will they hit first? India or the U.S.? I don’t think Pakistan can be saved, frankly. Its history is one of Islamic fanaticism. It was created because the Muslims of the Indo-Pakistan region couldn’t get along with the Hindus that lived there. They still don’t.

The big question is, when they launch the Islamic bomb, who will they hit first? India or the U.S.?

]]> By: SnoopyTheGoon http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30305 SnoopyTheGoon Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:24:16 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30305 All true - however, the alternative that seems like more and more probable - an Islamist coup that will turn the Pakistani army (with the nukes, let's not forget) in a toy in some Islamofascist's hand is hardly more palatable. Yep, hard choice, but necessary. All true – however, the alternative that seems like more and more probable – an Islamist coup that will turn the Pakistani army (with the nukes, let’s not forget) in a toy in some Islamofascist’s hand is hardly more palatable.

Yep, hard choice, but necessary.

]]> By: Laurence Simon http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172/comment-page-1#comment-30303 Laurence Simon Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:06:59 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/27/4172#comment-30303 Same thing happened with Princess Di. *shrug* Same thing happened with Princess Di. *shrug*

]]>