Comments on: Jackson’s cagey http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/03/4062 Cutting straight to the point Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:03:40 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Michael Lonie http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/03/4062/comment-page-1#comment-29955 Michael Lonie Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:14:02 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/03/4062#comment-29955 Good point Sabba. Why the reporters continue to write about Hamas accepting a cease fire when they have continually refused that publically, can be explained only by the triumph of wishful thinking over reality. That seems to be a state that most of the American and Israel government officials live in as well. When the Arabs are sick of losing and being killed they will make peace, and not until then. Good point Sabba. Why the reporters continue to write about Hamas accepting a cease fire when they have continually refused that publically, can be explained only by the triumph of wishful thinking over reality. That seems to be a state that most of the American and Israel government officials live in as well.

When the Arabs are sick of losing and being killed they will make peace, and not until then.

]]> By: Sabba Hillel http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/03/4062/comment-page-1#comment-29953 Sabba Hillel Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:39:00 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/12/03/4062#comment-29953 <blockquote>The one option that doesn’t seem to be getting serious consideration is perhaps the only one that Hamas itself might accept: a cease-fire with Israel that would end attacks by both sides, open Gaza to normal commerce and allow the peace negotiations to go forward without interference.</blockquote> Actually, there is a typo in the above sentence. It should actually read <i>The one option that doesn’t seem to be getting serious consideration is perhaps the one that Hamas absolutely <b>refuses</b> to accept:</i>

The one option that doesn’t seem to be getting serious consideration is perhaps the only one that Hamas itself might accept: a cease-fire with Israel that would end attacks by both sides, open Gaza to normal commerce and allow the peace negotiations to go forward without interference.

Actually, there is a typo in the above sentence. It should actually read

The one option that doesn’t seem to be getting serious consideration is perhaps the one that Hamas absolutely refuses to accept:

]]>