<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Annapolis quid pro quo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2007/11/25/4021/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/11/25/4021</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/11/25/4021/comment-page-1#comment-29769</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/11/25/4021#comment-29769</guid>
		<description>Not saying I agree with the approach of course.  If the question is, &quot;Who would we rather have on our side, Saudi Arabia or God?&quot;, the answer is obvious to us.  But the halls of power demand compromise, and the will of God is something that is sadly easy to forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not saying I agree with the approach of course.  If the question is, &#8220;Who would we rather have on our side, Saudi Arabia or God?&#8221;, the answer is obvious to us.  But the halls of power demand compromise, and the will of God is something that is sadly easy to forget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/11/25/4021/comment-page-1#comment-29765</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/11/25/4021#comment-29765</guid>
		<description>Meryl, I think you&#039;re pretty much spot-on in your assessment that this conference is to make the US look good in Arab eyes.  Our main middle-east policy concern at the moment is Iran.  The more Arab states we have on our side in that mess, the better.  A little chiding of Israel in front of their representatives will help quiet their streets, easing the way for their governments to take a hard line against Iran along with the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meryl, I think you&#8217;re pretty much spot-on in your assessment that this conference is to make the US look good in Arab eyes.  Our main middle-east policy concern at the moment is Iran.  The more Arab states we have on our side in that mess, the better.  A little chiding of Israel in front of their representatives will help quiet their streets, easing the way for their governments to take a hard line against Iran along with the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
