<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modo on Rudy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:03:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: soccer dad</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/comment-page-1#comment-29199</link>
		<dc:creator>soccer dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848#comment-29199</guid>
		<description>Alex - guilty as charged. :-)

What really gets me though is that she (whoever she is) gets invited to dinners at the Cheneys even though she doesn&#039;t like him, but he&#039;s never invited me even though I supported him!

Drew, chsw and JDF,
Sure she portrayed Giuliani with a degree of contempt, but as Drew pointed out
&lt;em&gt;I read the column expecting to ultimately encounter some sort of Krugman-like denunciation of wicked Republicanism, but it never arrived.&lt;/em&gt;
That, plus she even puts &quot;even-handed&quot; in scare quotes to describe Baker &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; recalls his famous kiss off of the Jewish vote.

I know that she&#039;s criticizing Rudy, but it&#039;s for all the right reasons.

SabbaHillel, thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; guilty as charged. :-)</p>
<p>What really gets me though is that she (whoever she is) gets invited to dinners at the Cheneys even though she doesn&#8217;t like him, but he&#8217;s never invited me even though I supported him!</p>
<p>Drew, chsw and JDF,<br />
Sure she portrayed Giuliani with a degree of contempt, but as Drew pointed out<br />
<em>I read the column expecting to ultimately encounter some sort of Krugman-like denunciation of wicked Republicanism, but it never arrived.</em><br />
That, plus she even puts &#8220;even-handed&#8221; in scare quotes to describe Baker <strong>and</strong> recalls his famous kiss off of the Jewish vote.</p>
<p>I know that she&#8217;s criticizing Rudy, but it&#8217;s for all the right reasons.</p>
<p>SabbaHillel, thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDF</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/comment-page-1#comment-29197</link>
		<dc:creator>JDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848#comment-29197</guid>
		<description>I do not believe that the column can be read anyway but that Maureen Dowd was sneering at Giuliani -- painting him as even more &quot;extreme&quot; than Bush, and pandering to the people she called  &quot;Jewish Hawks&quot;.  I agree that the column has made me take a second look at Giuliani.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that the column can be read anyway but that Maureen Dowd was sneering at Giuliani &#8212; painting him as even more &#8220;extreme&#8221; than Bush, and pandering to the people she called  &#8220;Jewish Hawks&#8221;.  I agree that the column has made me take a second look at Giuliani.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabba Hillel</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/comment-page-1#comment-29187</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabba Hillel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848#comment-29187</guid>
		<description>Since you still have to sign in, pick one of the logins from &lt;a&gt;Bug Me Not&lt;/a&gt; that expresses your opinion of those idiots.   That way the spammers that the NY &lt;i&gt;Slimes&lt;/i&gt; sells the data to would not find you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you still have to sign in, pick one of the logins from <a>Bug Me Not</a> that expresses your opinion of those idiots.   That way the spammers that the NY <i>Slimes</i> sells the data to would not find you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsw</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/comment-page-1#comment-29185</link>
		<dc:creator>chsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848#comment-29185</guid>
		<description>I think that anyone who reads quasiMoDo&#039;s column will vote for Giuliani!  Great endorsement, Mo!

chsw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that anyone who reads quasiMoDo&#8217;s column will vote for Giuliani!  Great endorsement, Mo!</p>
<p>chsw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew W</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/comment-page-1#comment-29181</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848#comment-29181</guid>
		<description>Ha. Assumuing that Alex Bensky&#039;s comment above is a joke -- and can we be sure it really is?* -- I felt the same way as Meryl about that MoDo column today. 

Since the NY Times is a kind of print version of an Upper West Side cocktail party, where opinions only need to be half-expressed -- because aren&#039;t we all on the same politically correct page anyway? -- clearly MoDo wants us to shake our heads woefully at Giuliani&#039;s willingness to call Islamic terrorism by its correct name. I read the column expecting to ultimately encounter some sort of Krugman-like denunciation of wicked Republicanism, but it never arrived. At least not in a way that rose above commonplace static of MSM punditry.

Maybe I should start pretending that that TimesSelect firewall is still in effect. I think it&#039;s worked for others.

*Long before the arrival of MoDo, the Boston Globe patented the &quot;woman writer&quot; construct, under the brand name &quot;Ellen Goodman.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. Assumuing that Alex Bensky&#8217;s comment above is a joke &#8212; and can we be sure it really is?* &#8212; I felt the same way as Meryl about that MoDo column today. </p>
<p>Since the NY Times is a kind of print version of an Upper West Side cocktail party, where opinions only need to be half-expressed &#8212; because aren&#8217;t we all on the same politically correct page anyway? &#8212; clearly MoDo wants us to shake our heads woefully at Giuliani&#8217;s willingness to call Islamic terrorism by its correct name. I read the column expecting to ultimately encounter some sort of Krugman-like denunciation of wicked Republicanism, but it never arrived. At least not in a way that rose above commonplace static of MSM punditry.</p>
<p>Maybe I should start pretending that that TimesSelect firewall is still in effect. I think it&#8217;s worked for others.</p>
<p>*Long before the arrival of MoDo, the Boston Globe patented the &#8220;woman writer&#8221; construct, under the brand name &#8220;Ellen Goodman.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bensky</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848/comment-page-1#comment-29178</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/17/3848#comment-29178</guid>
		<description>Soccerdad, I&#039;m sorry to see you&#039;ve fallen for the elaborate practical joke the NY Times editorial staff plays on its readers.

Another time I&#039;ll show the process of logic and reasoning that inevitably led to this conclusion but for the time being I&#039;ll just tell you that there is no &quot;Maureen Dowd.&quot; MoDo, as we fans like to call the construct, is the Times&#039;s caricature of the &quot;woman writer.&quot; I&#039;d think the cutsy nicknames she gives world leaders would be one giveaway.

That&#039;s just an actress who plays the role on the Sunday talk shows. &quot;Maureen Dowd&quot; has as much existence as Betty Crocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soccerdad, I&#8217;m sorry to see you&#8217;ve fallen for the elaborate practical joke the NY Times editorial staff plays on its readers.</p>
<p>Another time I&#8217;ll show the process of logic and reasoning that inevitably led to this conclusion but for the time being I&#8217;ll just tell you that there is no &#8220;Maureen Dowd.&#8221; MoDo, as we fans like to call the construct, is the Times&#8217;s caricature of the &#8220;woman writer.&#8221; I&#8217;d think the cutsy nicknames she gives world leaders would be one giveaway.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just an actress who plays the role on the Sunday talk shows. &#8220;Maureen Dowd&#8221; has as much existence as Betty Crocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
