<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private anti-terror efforts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/16/3838/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/16/3838</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:03:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/16/3838/comment-page-1#comment-29139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/16/3838#comment-29139</guid>
		<description>The real question that should be asked is why is the U.S. government dependent on any private anti-terror organizations in the first place.  The answer is painfully simple.  The U.S government still refuses to define the enemy in terms of Jihadists and refuses to develop a policy on Islamism.  The private anti-terror groups should deserve every bit of kudos for trying to do what the most powerful government in the world lacks the resolve to do itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question that should be asked is why is the U.S. government dependent on any private anti-terror organizations in the first place.  The answer is painfully simple.  The U.S government still refuses to define the enemy in terms of Jihadists and refuses to develop a policy on Islamism.  The private anti-terror groups should deserve every bit of kudos for trying to do what the most powerful government in the world lacks the resolve to do itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/16/3838/comment-page-1#comment-29136</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/16/3838#comment-29136</guid>
		<description>We&#039;d (the Allied forces) never be able to fight and win World War II today, considering the &quot;need&quot; of the various media to expose every secret they can lay their hands on, regardless of the consequences to the war effort.

It boils down to a case of oneupmanship - break the story first, thus increasing ratings, and to hell with the results.

We&#039;re going to commit societal suicide, and I have no idea how the trend can be reversed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;d (the Allied forces) never be able to fight and win World War II today, considering the &#8220;need&#8221; of the various media to expose every secret they can lay their hands on, regardless of the consequences to the war effort.</p>
<p>It boils down to a case of oneupmanship &#8211; break the story first, thus increasing ratings, and to hell with the results.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re going to commit societal suicide, and I have no idea how the trend can be reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
