<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Syrian incursion: Oh Debka, Debka&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:21:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768/comment-page-1#comment-28899</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768#comment-28899</guid>
		<description>So was the report wrong? Certainly not. The Israelis - as far I understand - tested ALSO the Russian weaponry. 
You should not forget that in these days there had been a lot of &quot;news&quot; about this story. Don&#039;t you think the that a lot of daily newspaper articles are full of speculations?
I agree that Debka reports have to be handled extremely carefully. I know this, of course, but nevertheless I am glad that there is Debka.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was the report wrong? Certainly not. The Israelis &#8211; as far I understand &#8211; tested ALSO the Russian weaponry.<br />
You should not forget that in these days there had been a lot of &#8220;news&#8221; about this story. Don&#8217;t you think the that a lot of daily newspaper articles are full of speculations?<br />
I agree that Debka reports have to be handled extremely carefully. I know this, of course, but nevertheless I am glad that there is Debka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnoopyTheGoon</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768/comment-page-1#comment-28867</link>
		<dc:creator>SnoopyTheGoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768#comment-28867</guid>
		<description>The point is that this Debka article, like tens (if not hundreds) before it, went very wide off the mark. It presented dealing with anti-aircraft defenses as the sole point of the exercise, which is simply wrong.

If you are Debka follower, you couldn&#039;t have missed other multiple cases of false prophecy. It is just their hobby, apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that this Debka article, like tens (if not hundreds) before it, went very wide off the mark. It presented dealing with anti-aircraft defenses as the sole point of the exercise, which is simply wrong.</p>
<p>If you are Debka follower, you couldn&#8217;t have missed other multiple cases of false prophecy. It is just their hobby, apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768/comment-page-1#comment-28858</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/10/02/3768#comment-28858</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t follow you. The Debka report talks about Russian weapons which might have been &quot;tested&quot; by Israeli airplanes. Meantime it is reported, that Russian technicians have entered Syria maybe to improve their weaponry.
So where ist the point? I agree that Debka has to be read with some distance. But for my feeling you exaggerate quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t follow you. The Debka report talks about Russian weapons which might have been &#8220;tested&#8221; by Israeli airplanes. Meantime it is reported, that Russian technicians have entered Syria maybe to improve their weaponry.<br />
So where ist the point? I agree that Debka has to be read with some distance. But for my feeling you exaggerate quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
