<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the free speech denier gets a platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/25/3730/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/25/3730</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:38:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Charlap</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/25/3730/comment-page-1#comment-28672</link>
		<dc:creator>David Charlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/25/3730#comment-28672</guid>
		<description>To all those who claim terrorists have a right to speak in the US: go re-read the Constitutiion.

The First Amendment says you have a right to speak.  It doesn&#039;t grant you the right to an audience, nor does it grant you the right to a forum in which to speak.

If terrorists want so speak, let them do it in their own forum - like Al Jazeera or something.  To claim that the US has some moral obligation to give them a wider audience is a perversion of the First Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all those who claim terrorists have a right to speak in the US: go re-read the Constitutiion.</p>
<p>The First Amendment says you have a right to speak.  It doesn&#8217;t grant you the right to an audience, nor does it grant you the right to a forum in which to speak.</p>
<p>If terrorists want so speak, let them do it in their own forum &#8211; like Al Jazeera or something.  To claim that the US has some moral obligation to give them a wider audience is a perversion of the First Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/25/3730/comment-page-1#comment-28642</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/25/3730#comment-28642</guid>
		<description>Bollinger may fancy himself brave for having &quot;confronted&quot; the head of a terrorist state, but taunting a caged jackal doesn&#039;t make it any less of a jackal.  Making fun of Hitler did not shut down Auswitz.  Patton&#039;s 3rd Army did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bollinger may fancy himself brave for having &#8220;confronted&#8221; the head of a terrorist state, but taunting a caged jackal doesn&#8217;t make it any less of a jackal.  Making fun of Hitler did not shut down Auswitz.  Patton&#8217;s 3rd Army did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
