<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Scott Adams antisemitic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722/comment-page-1#comment-28567</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722#comment-28567</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if you read his blog today, he&#039;s basically saying that anyone who read that first post and accused him of being antisemitic has a &quot;mental problem.&quot; Actually, he seems to think anyone who doesn&#039;t agree with every word he says is basically an idiot.
Personally, I agree that he isn&#039;t necessarily an antisemite (at least, based on what he wrote in these posts). But I do think he&#039;s an a--. And I&#039;ve lost any desire to continue reading his comic strip and make him even richer than he already is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if you read his blog today, he&#8217;s basically saying that anyone who read that first post and accused him of being antisemitic has a &#8220;mental problem.&#8221; Actually, he seems to think anyone who doesn&#8217;t agree with every word he says is basically an idiot. </p>
<p>Personally, I agree that he isn&#8217;t necessarily an antisemite (at least, based on what he wrote in these posts). But I do think he&#8217;s an a&#8211;. And I&#8217;ve lost any desire to continue reading his comic strip and make him even richer than he already is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722/comment-page-1#comment-28566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722#comment-28566</guid>
		<description>While Adams may not be an antisemite, he certainly exhibits what seems to be a common trait on the left these days: sensitivity to all people except Jews, and to all nations except Israel. (Of course, whenever Jews complain about this treatment, they get accused of oversensitivity.)
Adams clearly intended this to be an anti-Bush Era screed. (An era of muffled freedom of speech, etc. -- which he sought to prove by incorrectly stating, in a phrase that he since changed on his website, that Columbia wasn&#039;t allowing Ahmadinejad to speak.) So in his sarcastic way, he asserts that Ahmadinejad didn&#039;t really deny the Holocause, and doesn&#039;t really intend to wipe Israel off the map -- assertions that to him don&#039;t really even need proving, because all they represent are straw men for the right wing to utilize in its attempt to dominate the world.
What he doesn&#039;t think about, and doesn&#039;t care about, is that these are issues that Jews (and, one would hope, other people) care about intrinsically. And his snarky attitude about them, which just says that he doesn&#039;t give a sh-t, represents a slap in the face to everyone who does care.
By the way, did you notice when he published that post? Yom Kippur. What a nice guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Adams may not be an antisemite, he certainly exhibits what seems to be a common trait on the left these days: sensitivity to all people except Jews, and to all nations except Israel. (Of course, whenever Jews complain about this treatment, they get accused of oversensitivity.)</p>
<p>Adams clearly intended this to be an anti-Bush Era screed. (An era of muffled freedom of speech, etc. &#8212; which he sought to prove by incorrectly stating, in a phrase that he since changed on his website, that Columbia wasn&#8217;t allowing Ahmadinejad to speak.) So in his sarcastic way, he asserts that Ahmadinejad didn&#8217;t really deny the Holocause, and doesn&#8217;t really intend to wipe Israel off the map &#8212; assertions that to him don&#8217;t really even need proving, because all they represent are straw men for the right wing to utilize in its attempt to dominate the world.</p>
<p>What he doesn&#8217;t think about, and doesn&#8217;t care about, is that these are issues that Jews (and, one would hope, other people) care about intrinsically. And his snarky attitude about them, which just says that he doesn&#8217;t give a sh-t, represents a slap in the face to everyone who does care. </p>
<p>By the way, did you notice when he published that post? Yom Kippur. What a nice guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie Schultz</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722/comment-page-1#comment-28556</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722#comment-28556</guid>
		<description>Trying an experiment.  When I comment, the comments system asks me if I want to download something.  Let&#039;s see what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying an experiment.  When I comment, the comments system asks me if I want to download something.  Let&#8217;s see what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie Schultz</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722/comment-page-1#comment-28555</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/24/3722#comment-28555</guid>
		<description>I saw that first post as snark.  He&#039;s parodying the people who don&#039;t want Ahmadinejad to speak.  &lt;i&gt;If you let a guy like that express his views, before long the entire world will want freedom of speech.&lt;/i&gt;  Pretty much gives it away, as does &lt;i&gt;I thank Jesus I do not live in a country led by a man who believes in that sort of bullshit.&lt;/i&gt;
The foul language is part of the parody.
In his second post, he sounds like a fellow who&#039;s decided that one nation is no better than another, in that they are all amoral and will do whatever is necessary to maintain their status.  This is what many &quot;progressives&quot; claim to believe, though they fail to see that this means that if no nation is better than another, no nation is worse than another.  Therefore, the US (or anyone) can do whatever it damn well pleases without moral stain.
Adams seems OK with that view.  I suspect, however, that he&#039;s just one of those guys who believes that his own mighty intellect elevates him above the mundane reptile-brained squabbling over whether the pot or kettle is blackest.  (Or, in other words, he&#039;s afraid his mighty intellect is not equal to the task of sorting it out.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that first post as snark.  He&#8217;s parodying the people who don&#8217;t want Ahmadinejad to speak.  <i>If you let a guy like that express his views, before long the entire world will want freedom of speech.</i>  Pretty much gives it away, as does <i>I thank Jesus I do not live in a country led by a man who believes in that sort of bullshit.</i> </p>
<p>The foul language is part of the parody.</p>
<p>In his second post, he sounds like a fellow who&#8217;s decided that one nation is no better than another, in that they are all amoral and will do whatever is necessary to maintain their status.  This is what many &#8220;progressives&#8221; claim to believe, though they fail to see that this means that if no nation is better than another, no nation is worse than another.  Therefore, the US (or anyone) can do whatever it damn well pleases without moral stain.</p>
<p>Adams seems OK with that view.  I suspect, however, that he&#8217;s just one of those guys who believes that his own mighty intellect elevates him above the mundane reptile-brained squabbling over whether the pot or kettle is blackest.  (Or, in other words, he&#8217;s afraid his mighty intellect is not equal to the task of sorting it out.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

