Comments on: 1 to 600 ratio http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689 Cutting straight to the point Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:14:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Robert http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689/comment-page-1#comment-28460 Robert Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:47:33 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689#comment-28460 If Carter had dropped a quick nuke on Tehran back in 79, the beginning of "peace in the Middle East" would have been a fond memory instead of a distant hope... Maybe the time has come in World History to do the job G-d gave Joshua that he didn't finish... Robert If Carter had dropped a quick nuke on Tehran back in 79, the beginning of “peace in the Middle East” would have been a fond memory instead of a distant hope…

Maybe the time has come in World History to do the job G-d gave Joshua that he didn’t finish…

Robert

]]> By: Joel Rosenberg http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689/comment-page-1#comment-28456 Joel Rosenberg Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:40:21 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689#comment-28456 It's pretty clear that we're going to see nuclear weapons used in the Middle East in the next ten years. It's obvious to me that it's better if it's just a few of them going off in Iran rather than a few of them going off in Israel and a lot in Iran and Syria, but maybe I'm missing something. It’s pretty clear that we’re going to see nuclear weapons used in the Middle East in the next ten years. It’s obvious to me that it’s better if it’s just a few of them going off in Iran rather than a few of them going off in Israel and a lot in Iran and Syria, but maybe I’m missing something.

]]> By: chsw http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689/comment-page-1#comment-28455 chsw Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:01:38 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689#comment-28455 I would not say that Israel has a missile advantage over Iran right now. Moreover, the process Iran employs to make nuclear weaponry fuel may be anal compulsive but it is also relatively low-tech for nuke work and Iran has supplies of uranium bearing shale. If the US, its European allies (if they still have balls) and Israel do not act soon, I am afraid that there will be a general nuclear war across the Middle East. Everybody loses. chsw I would not say that Israel has a missile advantage over Iran right now. Moreover, the process Iran employs to make nuclear weaponry fuel may be anal compulsive but it is also relatively low-tech for nuke work and Iran has supplies of uranium bearing shale.

If the US, its European allies (if they still have balls) and Israel do not act soon, I am afraid that there will be a general nuclear war across the Middle East. Everybody loses.

chsw

]]> By: Not-my-real-name http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689/comment-page-1#comment-28449 Not-my-real-name Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:58:32 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2007/09/18/3689#comment-28449 The Diamona advantage won't last forever, Israel has it now; And while no nation should use such a resource without strong cause, I hope Jerusalem remember's that this is one advantage whose exceedingly high value seems to be eroding. Looking at what has happened to other nation's that tried to destory God's credibility (for he has made promises concerning Israel,) I would say that North Korea, Syria, and Iran are the nation's in trouble, not Israel. Because countries that have tried this in the past have *always* been turned to scrap. I think it's obvious to any rational observer that North Korea had delivered nuclear material and something was happening at that "agricultural research station." Or at least, that something was going to happen. Something did. The whole place was made too radioactive to grow anything for a very long time. One thing more; It's not Iran whose destruction is certain, it's Syria's; Particularly for the people who live in and around Damascus. Because Isaiah wrote that this city would be utterly destroyed -- or something very close to that. And as I read the text, it seems to me that this happens because they will have made war on Israel foolishly and without cause. The Diamona advantage won’t last forever, Israel has it now; And while no nation should use such a resource without strong cause, I hope Jerusalem remember’s that this is one advantage whose exceedingly high value seems to be eroding.

Looking at what has happened to other nation’s that tried to destory God’s credibility (for he has made promises concerning Israel,) I would say that North Korea, Syria, and Iran are the nation’s in trouble, not Israel. Because countries that have tried this in the past have *always* been turned to scrap.

I think it’s obvious to any rational observer that North Korea had delivered nuclear material and something was happening at that “agricultural research station.” Or at least, that something was going to happen. Something did. The whole place was made too radioactive to grow anything for a very long time.

One thing more; It’s not Iran whose destruction is certain, it’s Syria’s; Particularly for the people who live in and around Damascus.

Because Isaiah wrote that this city would be utterly destroyed — or something very close to that.

And as I read the text, it seems to me that this happens because they will have made war on Israel foolishly and without cause.

]]>