Comments on: Zionists: “giving goal in free field”.

By: Veeshir

Veeshir — Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:22:35 +0000

Kavkaz and Chechny really depress me.

Except for China and the plane incident in 2001 and Chechnya, I generally like Bush’s foreign policy.
In Chechnya he really screwed the pooch.

I used to read Kavkaz and other Chechnyan sites a lot before 2001, during the beginning of their latest war with Russia.

Russia has treated and is treating Chechnya horribly.
First off, those Moscow apartment buildings that were blown up supposedly by Chechnyans doesn’t pass the smell test. There was one, Ryazan (pdf warning) where the residents of the building caught some FSB types planting real bombs. When they got caught, the FSB types said, “This was a test and you passed! Hooray!”
I have a feeling that failing would have meant explosion. Why have a test with real bombs?
They raized Grozny fairly early on, it’s mostly just rubble now. They killed and/or kidnapped just about every male between 13 and 70 and occasionally ransomed back the dead and raped bodies. There were credible reports of Russian soldiers killing and then raping, in that order.

Then, 9/11 happened. Kavkaz had a message of condolence for the US. No weasel words, just a “Sorry that you are dealing with what we’ve been dealing with from Russia.”

Bush then met with Putie poot poot and blew off anything about Chechnya. That’s the beginning of when they started allowing jihadis in. They had no allies and were, and are, being exterminated like so many pests.

I don’t condone terrorism, but I can understand why they resorted it. There’s no excuse for the Beslan attack, but they know that. They got stuck having only jihadis as allies and the moderate, democratically elected president was killed.

By: Ben F

Ben F — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:44:45 +0000

AJWS is a Zionist outfit??? I think not. Not that they’re anti-Zionist, mind you. They’re just focused on other things.

So much for the “we’re not against Jews, only against the Zionists” canard.

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:11:18 +0000

Not much you can say in response to this idiot. But it might be worth noting that in most Arab countries, there is a glaring discrepancy between the literacy rates of men and women.

By: Michael Lonie

Michael Lonie — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:01:13 +0000

Richard B. Haldane, the great, reforming Minister of War in the Pre-WWI British Liberal Government, who was fluent in German and a student of German philosophy, once commented that Kaiser Wilhelm II’s speeches sounded much less silly in German than they did in English translation. Maybe B. Ali’s fulminations sound less silly in Arabic or Pushtun than they do in English. They could hardly help it.

I gather B. Ali’s view of the impermissability of violence between men and women doesn’t include men being violent towards women, only women being violent back at them. Some people just don’t know their proper place.

By: chsw

chsw — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:54:22 +0000

“Ferawoon” is probably translated as “Pharoah.”

There is not one assertion that he makes that is logically or evidentially supported by anything other than the qat B.Ali smokes. And I, for one, do not want to sexually enjoy B. Ali’s women. They probably smell like his goats and probably are missing teeth.

By: cond0010

cond0010 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:36:15 +0000

“They use the strategy of Ferawoon, who killed the men, and alive the women.”

Hmmm… Alive? Liberate? Kill the men, free the women…

Well… I think I have a translation: “Kill the Terrorists, free the women”

There. So… whats wrong with that?

Sounds like B. Ali needs a little more of that ‘forbidden’ education if he is going to get his point across clearly. Sheeesh….