For those of you who don’t listen to the SNN podcast every week, this is my contribution from Sunday:
I’m sure you’ve all heard the phrase, “tyranny of the majority”. My topic today is the tyranny of the minority—specifically of the Muslim variety.
Consider what has happened over the past several weeks in Europe and America, and for longer than that in Australia.
In Britain, a police officer asked not to be assigned to the Israeli Embassy. The first reasons given in news articles were a refusal on “moral grounds”. He objected to the war with Hizbullah.
Scotland Yard is now saying the first story isn’t true, and that it’sa safety issue—the police officer, who has family in Lebanon, was afraid for his family in Lebanon if he should be spotted guarding the Israeli embassy.
I don’t know what the truth is; this story will doubtless play out further, but the point is this: Events in Lebanon are affecting actions in London, and they are driven by Muslims—who are in the minority in Britain.
Meanwhile, in Minnesota, home to a large Somali immigrant population, Muslim cab drivers are refusing to pick up certain passengers at Minneapolis-St. Paul airport—the ones carrying alcohol. The airport says that about three people per day are turned down by Muslim cabbies, and they are trying to figure out some kind of signal so that passengers will know which cabbies will take them if they have a bottle of beer in their hand, and which will not. Granted, three times a day at an airport is not a lot, but stay with me on this one, it’s going to work into the tyranny theme.
In London, a blind woman was refused service by a Muslim cab driver because he said her dog was unclean and refused to have it in his cab. The driver was ultimately fined 1,400 pounds. This did not dissuade him. He said he would again refuse to allow any dogs in his cab, even guide dogs for the blind. This is also, by the way, not the first complaint of its kind in London.
Apparently, this is common practice in Melbourne, Australia, where at least 20 blind people have complained that Muslim cabbies wouldn’t take them as fares because they had guide dogs.
Also in London, an art gallery removed paintings by surrealist Hans Bellmer the day before an exhibition was due to open, for fear of—you guessed it—giving offense to Muslims.
Let’s go back a week or so, to Berlin, where an opera house pulled a Mozart production because it included a scene featuring the severed heads of Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha, and Poseidon. The opera house administration weren’t afraid of offended Greeks wielding pitchforks. They were afraid of—say it with me, folks—offending Muslims.
I sense my listeners have picked up on the pattern here. And you’ve also picked up on the name I am giving this habit of Muslims taking offense at everything remotely offensive to their religion: It is the tyranny of the minority. The minority, in this case Muslims, are trying to force the majority, in this case non-Muslims, to adhere to the restrictions of the minority’s religion. This is, strangely, the exact opposite of the usual kind of religious discrimination. Muslim cab drivers feel completely entitled to not allowing dogs or alcohol into their cabs. We non-Muslims are supposed to just suck it up and accept this.
I don’t accept this. If you allow a religious exception for alcohol and dogs, you head down a slippery slope. What’s next, refusing to take women passengers in short skirts?
It isn’t the Muslim cab driver who gets to say who and what gets into his cab. His job is to pick up fares, not to pick and choose them. If it is illegal in America for a cab driver to refuse to pick up a black man, then it should be illegal in America for a cab driver to refuse to pick up that same man because he’s holding a can of beer. Or because he has a bottle of wine in his luggage.
By the same token, canceling an opera, or an art display, or refusing to publish cartoons of Mohammed—or to portray him on a South Park episode, for that matter—are all part of the new wave of catering to the tyranny of the minority. And that is simply unacceptable.
It’s time to stop catering to a narrow-minded few who think the world should bend its rules to fit them. This isn’t about respecting their religion. It’s about someone who has chosen a profession in public service refusing to serve the public.
You don’t want to take the chance of encountering dogs or alcohol in your cab? Simple solution: Don’t drive a cab.