Comments on: Spam mathematics http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/25/1755 Cutting straight to the point Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:14:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: cond0010 http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/25/1755/comment-page-1#comment-16377 cond0010 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:11:38 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/25/1755#comment-16377 er... does that mean I should re-submit the 2 emails I sent to you on the 23rd and 24th? er… does that mean I should re-submit the 2 emails I sent to you on the 23rd and 24th?

]]> By: Rajan R http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/25/1755/comment-page-1#comment-16279 Rajan R Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:15:44 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/25/1755#comment-16279 A better solution is high, bankruptcy-inducing fines that would remove any economic incentive for spamming. Catch, say, 15% of spammers, the rest would be too scared to spam anymore. Plus, instead of merely jailing - which costs taxpayers money, huge fines would strip them of all of their assets. And then, if the fine outstrips that, even jailtime - but they would be funding it. Kill two birds with one stone. A better solution is high, bankruptcy-inducing fines that would remove any economic incentive for spamming. Catch, say, 15% of spammers, the rest would be too scared to spam anymore. Plus, instead of merely jailing – which costs taxpayers money, huge fines would strip them of all of their assets. And then, if the fine outstrips that, even jailtime – but they would be funding it.

Kill two birds with one stone.

]]>