Comments on: Suicidal agreements http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424 Cutting straight to the point Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:31:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ben F http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1352 Ben F Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:40:58 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1352 Israel <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/657368.html" rel="nofollow">blinks</a>. Israel blinks.

]]> By: GideonSwart http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1334 GideonSwart Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:32:38 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1334 Listen Meryl, you're getting unnecessarily out of shape on this. The key word in this Paper is <b>"Unless"</b>. This stipulation word has always worked for Israel in the past, because it's always up to Israel and Israel only, to determine when "Unless" qualifies. Reread it again, this time taking note where it appears. We've got some pretty clever Joo Shysters over here. The smart part of negotiation is always to make your opponent feel big, while you <i>shtump</i> them… Hag Sameach. Listen Meryl, you’re getting unnecessarily out of shape on this. The key word in this Paper is “Unless”. This stipulation word has always worked for Israel in the past, because it’s always up to Israel and Israel only, to determine when “Unless” qualifies. Reread it again, this time taking note where it appears.

We’ve got some pretty clever Joo Shysters over here. The smart part of negotiation is always to make your opponent feel big, while you shtump them…

Hag Sameach.

]]> By: Meryl Yourish http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1331 Meryl Yourish Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:46:53 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1331 Let me make it quite clear: I don't want to see words like "Dhimmicrat" on my blog. I don't give a damn if you don't like the Democrats. I don't care if you don't like the "Rethuglicans." Neither term is welcome here. It's breaking the no-flaming rule. The one that's in every comment box. Let me make it quite clear: I don’t want to see words like “Dhimmicrat” on my blog.

I don’t give a damn if you don’t like the Democrats. I don’t care if you don’t like the “Rethuglicans.” Neither term is welcome here. It’s breaking the no-flaming rule. The one that’s in every comment box.

]]> By: Michael Lonie http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1329 Michael Lonie Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:15:42 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1329 Well Robert that means 76% of American Jews are idiots. That's the percentage who voted Dem last year. Not that I disagree with you. The penchant of Jews to continue voting liberal and left in this day and age seems to me a contradiction of our reputation for high average intelligence. I wish they would notice that FDR is no longer on the Democratic ticket. Well Robert that means 76% of American Jews are idiots. That’s the percentage who voted Dem last year.

Not that I disagree with you. The penchant of Jews to continue voting liberal and left in this day and age seems to me a contradiction of our reputation for high average intelligence. I wish they would notice that FDR is no longer on the Democratic ticket.

]]> By: Robert http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1326 Robert Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:06:39 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1326 Any Jew who votes Democratic is an idiot....pure and simple. Think its bad now...if you had a Dhimmicrat in office Israel would be in serious jeopardy with the likes of ANSWER, ISM, MOVEON.org Dhimmis running the Party of Surrender oh I mean Democrats. Any Jew who votes Democratic is an idiot….pure and simple. Think its bad now…if you had a Dhimmicrat in office Israel would be in serious jeopardy with the likes of ANSWER, ISM, MOVEON.org Dhimmis running the Party of Surrender oh I mean Democrats.

]]> By: alexbmn http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1325 alexbmn Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:58:21 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1325 I have to say that this "news item" wasnt repeated in any other newspaper. I have to say that this “news item” wasnt repeated in any other newspaper.

]]> By: Ben F http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1313 Ben F Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:49:18 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1313 Sabba Hillel-- The Israeli position reported in the Ha'aretz article isn't so bad, for the reason that you state. The real problem is the reported positions of the US and the World Bank--that, no matter what the security situation, at least one crossing must always be kept open. My sense is that Sharon usually blinks in these stare-downs with the Bush Administration. It will be interesting to see whether, with elections in the offing, he stays true to form. Sabba Hillel–

The Israeli position reported in the Ha’aretz article isn’t so bad, for the reason that you state. The real problem is the reported positions of the US and the World Bank–that, no matter what the security situation, at least one crossing must always be kept open.

My sense is that Sharon usually blinks in these stare-downs with the Bush Administration. It will be interesting to see whether, with elections in the offing, he stays true to form.

]]> By: Ben F http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1312 Ben F Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:43:43 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1312 Condi had an Op-Ed in the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/09/AR2005120901711.html" rel="nofollow">positing</a> that the greatest danger to US national security is weak and failing states. So what does the US do? Push as hard as possible for the creation of ANOTHER weak, failing state. What is WRONG with these people? How bad are things in the PA today? Khaled Abu Toameh reports in the <a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1&cid=1132475720103&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull" rel="nofollow">Jerusalem Post</a> that Christians in Bethlehem are asking HAMAS to protect them against a rumored Christmas attack by Zarqawi; Bethlehem's mayor is trying to discredit the rumors by attributing them to "collaborators" with Israel. Condi had an Op-Ed in the Washington Post positing that the greatest danger to US national security is weak and failing states. So what does the US do? Push as hard as possible for the creation of ANOTHER weak, failing state. What is WRONG with these people?

How bad are things in the PA today? Khaled Abu Toameh reports in the Jerusalem Post that Christians in Bethlehem are asking HAMAS to protect them against a rumored Christmas attack by Zarqawi; Bethlehem’s mayor is trying to discredit the rumors by attributing them to “collaborators” with Israel.

]]> By: AndrewBare http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1309 AndrewBare Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:37:21 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1309 Meryl, I'm not sure if you saw this, but I thought it's something you might find interesting: http://www.eyeontheun.org/view.asp?l=21&p=142#01 Meryl, I’m not sure if you saw this, but I thought it’s something you might find interesting:

http://www.eyeontheun.org/view.asp?l=21&p=142#01

]]> By: Joel http://www.yourish.com/2005/12/12/424/comment-page-1#comment-1304 Joel Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:23:13 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=424#comment-1304 More reason not to believe this. Akiva Eldar the "reporter" is an anti Zionist polemic who works at Haaretz. He is never right on anythihng. More reason not to believe this. Akiva Eldar the “reporter” is an anti Zionist polemic who works at Haaretz. He is never right on anythihng.

]]>