I understand that almost nobody reads to the end of a news article. I get that you bury information deeply when you don’t want it to be very well noticed. Usually, this works to Israel’s disadvantage, as the anti-Israel media bias spins pro-palestinian on a regular basis.

But here’s what the AP considers a newsworthy explanation of the subject of one of its news articles.

First, the context: The man who would have been the New York City Fire Department’s new Muslim chaplain resigned after Newsday published this quote regarding what he thought about 15 of the 19 hijackers who destroyed the WTC being from Saudi Arabia:

“I’ve heard professionals say that nowhere ever in history did a steel building come down with fire alone,” he told the newspaper.
“It takes two or three weeks to demolish a building like that. But it was pulled down in a couple of hours,” he said. “Was it 19 hijackers who brought it down, or was it a conspiracy?”

So far, so good. But the AP decided they needed to add more information.

Here are the final four paragraphs of the article:

“It’s sad,” said Kevin James, a spokesman for the Islamic Society of Fire Department Personnel. “We had no idea those were his views. He’s entitled to his opinion but he’s not the right person for the chaplain.”

Mayor Michael Bloomberg welcomed Habib’s resignation.

“The remarks were offensive and the mayor is satisfied that the chaplain has resigned,” mayoral spokesman Ed Skyler said.

Some have blamed the destruction of the trade center on a U.S. or Israeli plot designed to whip up support for attacks on Muslim countries. In 2003, New Jersey eliminated Amiri Baraka’s position as poet laureate after he wrote a poem suggesting Israel had advance knowledge of the attacks.

They could easily have ended the story without the final paragraph. But they didn’t. Instead, they mention Israel twice when discussing the fever dreams of the Muslim world. Why, you’d think the AP wants people to think the Jews did it, or something.

Even more interesting, you can read the NY Newsday story on their website, and not once is the word “Israel” mentioned. In fact, the would-be chaplain never mentioned Israel, not in that article, and not in the follow-up piece.

So why, one must ask, did the AP bring it up in the article?

I have my suspicions.

Looks like Jay surprised me and uploaded the new theme while I was working.

Thanks, Jay. It looks wonderful!

Update: Okay, now I’m kvelling. The more I look, the more I like.

I’ll be adapting the CSS to change the typestyles when I get the time, but wow, I really like this layout, Jay. Really nice job. Really.

Sometimes, my posts write themselves. Let’s look at two recent AP articles. The first, dated Sept. 29th, is about the U.S. refusal to give control of the Internet to the United Nations:

GENEVA (AP) - A senior U.S. official rejected calls on Thursday for a U.N. body to take over control of the main computers that direct traffic on the Internet, reiterating U.S. intentions to keep its historical role as the medium’s principal overseer.

“We will not agree to the U.N. taking over the management of the Internet,” said Ambassador David Gross, the U.S. coordinator for international communications and information policy at the State Department. “Some countries want that. We think that’s unacceptable.”

Many countries, particularly developing ones, have become increasingly concerned about the U.S. control, which stems from the country’s role in creating the Internet as a Pentagon project and funding much of its early development.

The second, written a day earlier, reports on the UN’s upcoming summit on Internet access in the developing world:

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Facing heated protest, the United Nations on Wednesday defended Tunisia’s hosting of a U.N. summit about Internet access in the developing world, even though the north African nation has been repeatedly accused of rights abuses that include blocking Web sites it dislikes.

Earlier this week, a coalition of human rights groups known as the Tunisia Monitoring Group issued a report that declared Tunisia unfit to hold the World Summit on the Information Society, set for November, because of reports that the government has stepped up attacks on the press and civil society.

The group, which has frequently criticized the selection of Tunisia as the host country, said the government has blocked access to Web sites belonging to Reporters Without Borders, other human rights watchdogs, and the independent press, while police monitor e-mails and Internet cafes.

“It does question to some extent the U.N.’s credibility that a world summit on the information society is taking place in a society where access to some Web sites is restricted,” said Alexis Krikorian, of the International Publishers’ Association. “It’s amazing that such a summit would take place in a country like this.”

Hypocrisy, thy name is United Nations.

But of course, it gets better. Because the UN bends itself into all kinds of twists to justify holding a summit on the Internet in a nation that does not allow open access to it.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s spokesman, Stephane Dujarric, said the summit could help pressure President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. Tunisia has long been accused of human rights abuses, while Ben Ali, who took power in a bloodless palace coup in 1987, has repeatedly won landslide electoral victories tainted by charges of fraud.

“These kinds of international conferences can be beneficial to the people in the country hosting them,” Dujarric said. “It opens up the country to the outside world and such a spotlight of attention gives the government strong incentives to try to meet international standards, including on human rights.”

Dujarric said that at the time Tunisia was selected, countries had wanted a developing nation to host the summit as a way of showing the importance of bringing Internet access to the developing world. He would not say if the United Nations or Annan had urged Tunisia to curb abuses ahead of the summit.

One would think that Tunisia will do what all dictatorships do: Use the summit as a great PR moment to brag about how forward-thinking Tunisia is, while brutally clamping down on protesters and its citizens who try to defy the Internet laws.

The summit Web site includes a message in which Ben Ali calls the summit an opportunity to help bridge the digital divide and bring about “an Information Society that is balanced and accessible to all.”

Whoops, look like he already is. And to think, I didn’t even have to read to the end of the article to predict that. Seen one dictatorship, seen ‘em all.

I suppose it could be worse. Yahoo might be giving Ben Ali the emails of reporters and dissidents.

By the way, some of the sponsors include Samsung, Microsoft, Alcatel and Ericsson. I suppose it could be worse. Yahoo could be supplying emails that Ben Ali would use to send people to prison.

Sure, let’s give the UN control of the Internet. I say we mark our calendar for the day Hell has a temperature of 32 degrees Fahrenheit.