Comments on: More victims of the “insurgency” http://www.yourish.com/2005/09/17/75 Cutting straight to the point Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:03:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Meryl Yourish http://www.yourish.com/2005/09/17/75/comment-page-1#comment-208 Meryl Yourish Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:05:41 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=75#comment-208 No, <a href="http://www.yourish.com/2005/09/17/70" rel="nofollow">The Exception Clause</a> applies only to Jews. No one else. This is an example of media bias and stupidity and unwillingness to call a terrorist a terrorist. No, The Exception Clause applies only to Jews. No one else.

This is an example of media bias and stupidity and unwillingness to call a terrorist a terrorist.

]]> By: Ben F http://www.yourish.com/2005/09/17/75/comment-page-1#comment-206 Ben F Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:38:57 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=75#comment-206 Is this an instance of the "exception clause" applying even when there are no Jews in the picture? Or, is this is an example of the extended exception clause? Perhaps the "insurgents" are seen as fighting against a puppet government installed by the "occupying forces" that were sent into Iraq thanks to the machinations of the "neo-cons," that is, by the Jews. Even if it's Arabs blowing up Arabs, perhaps a Jewish connection, no matter how attenuated or even fanciful, is enough to merit keeping the "terrorist" label on the shelf. Is this an instance of the “exception clause” applying even when there are no Jews in the picture?

Or, is this is an example of the extended exception clause? Perhaps the “insurgents” are seen as fighting against a puppet government installed by the “occupying forces” that were sent into Iraq thanks to the machinations of the “neo-cons,” that is, by the Jews. Even if it’s Arabs blowing up Arabs, perhaps a Jewish connection, no matter how attenuated or even fanciful, is enough to merit keeping the “terrorist” label on the shelf.

]]>